About Access
I am a member of ACCESS | I am applying to ACCESS
S. Zipursky, Ph.D.  
   
 
Affiliations
Distinguished Professor, Biological Chemistry
Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Member, ACCESS Program: Dept. of Biological Chemistry, Brain Research Institute, JCCC Cancer Cell Biology Program Area, Neuroscience Graduate Program

Education:
Degree: Ph.D., Albert Einstein College of Medicine


Contact Information:
Work Email Address: lzipursky@mednet.ucla.edu
Biological Chemistry: 310-825-6545 (Office Phone)
310-825-6693 (Accounting Phone)
310-826-1722 (Purchasing Phone)
Work Address: Office
5784 MRL
675 Charles E. Young Dr. South
Los Angeles, CA 90095
UNITED STATES
Work Address: Laboratory
5619, 5629 MRL
675 Charles E. Young Dr. South
Los Angeles, CA 90095
UNITED STATES
Site Navigation URL: http://www.biolchem.ucla.edu/Labs/zipursky/index.html


Direct Contact Information:
Work Phone Number: (310) 825-2834 Office
310-206-3750 Lab


Research Interest:
The Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Neuronal Connection Specificity

The communication between neurons relies on precise patterns of interconnections between them. These connections are referred to as synapses. We are interested in understanding the molecular mechanisms by which these connections are specified. This is a problem of daunting complexity. In the human brain there are about a trillion neurons linked together into a communication network by some thousand trillion synaptic connections. Even in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster that we study there are 250,000 neurons and millions of synaptic connections. How do correct connections form during development? Presumably specific molecular labels on the surface of different neurons provide a basis for the cellular recognition that underlies this specificity. Identifying these labels and understanding how they work is the central goal of my laboratory.

To approach this issue we have been studying the formation of connections in the fruit fly brain. The fly is well suited to the identification of mutants in which connection specificity is disrupted. Importantly, we can easily visualize the patterns of connections made by different neurons and manipulate these cells genetically. Three areas of study that are being actively pursued are described below.

The Dscam gene is alternatively spliced to give rise to a large family of highly related proteins that are biochemically distinct

We have studied a number of genes encoding cell surface proteins that are required for normal patterns of connection specificity in the fly. Among these Dscam remains the most intriguing. Remarkably, the Dscam gene encodes more than 38,000 different proteins. This occurs through a process called alternative splicing. All forms or isoforms of Dscam have the same overall domain structure or shape, but have different amino acid sequences within specific regions of the protein. Do these different isoforms have different recognition specificities and, if so, does this property contribute to connection specificity? We have approached this question using a combined biochemical and genetic approach.

Dscam is required for normal connections to form in many regions of the nervous system. In the olfactory system, for instance, it is required for different subclasses of olfactory neurons to connect to the correct group of cells in the brain that processes olfactory information. It is also required for the construction of a central brain structure called the mushroom body (MB) that is important for learning and memory. Using specific genetic manipulations, we have been able to remove all forms of Dscam from single MB neurons and replace them with only one of the 38000 potential isoforms. Surprisingly, different isoforms can provide substantial activity to fulfill the function provided by the entire collection of isoforms indicating that each isoform is likely to share a core biochemical function. What is this biochemical function and is it modulated by the sequence diversity of Dscam?

Using a biochemical approach we have shown that single isoforms of Dscam interact with each other. These findings indicate that one form of Dscam on the surface of a cell will bind to the same form on the surface of an opposing cell. Remarkably, these interactions are very specific. Indeed, two very closely related isoforms do not interact. Hence, Dscam provides a family of closely related proteins with similar functions that shows literally thousands of binding specificities.

While different isoforms of Dscam exhibit different binding specificities single neurons express multiple isoforms. For instance, in collaboration with Andy Chess’ laboratory at Whitehead Institute at MIT, we have shown that each single MB neuron expresses multiple isoforms of Dscam. Furthermore, each MB neuron expresses a combination of isoforms that is distinct from, though perhaps overlapping with, their neighbors. As such, each MB neuron may exhibit a combination of labels that specifies its unique identity. It remains possible that the specific combination of isoforms in a single neuron is not essential, it is only important for each neuron has a cell surface identity that is different from its neighbors. Presumably the nature of Dscam proteins expressed on the surface of a neuron will influence the nature of its interactions with neighboring cells. How these exquisite binding specificities are related to Dscam function in vivo is a critical issue that we are examining using various classical and molecular genetic approaches.

Formation of Neuronal Connections in the Fly Visual System

We have been studying the formation of the connections between photoreceptor neurons (R cells) and their targets in the brain. The compound eye of the fly contains some 800 simple eyes, or ommatidia, and each ommatidium contains eight R cells. These cells fall into three classes based on synaptic specificity. R1-R6 neurons connect to the first optic ganglion, called the lamina, and R7 and R8 neurons extend axons through the lamina and terminate in two distinct layers in the second optic ganglion, the medulla.

During the last year we have focused largely on genes required for R7 specificity. Three different classes of mutations have been identified. One leads to R7 neurons terminating in the R8 layer instead of R7. Another leads to abnormal connections within the appropriate layer . And the third class appears to make connections in multiple layers in the correct ganglion, the medulla. Alternatively, this class of mutations may disrupt the intracellular transport of synaptic vesicle components.

Mutations in N-cadherin disrupt the connections between R7 and its target. N-cadherin is a cell surface protein that promotes interactions between two closely opposed membranes. Molecular analysis revealed that eight isoforms of Dscam are generated by alternative splicing. To our surprise, one mutation in N-cadherin disrupted alternative splicing such that only four of the eight isoforms were generated in the eye. While R7 neurons lacking these isoforms exhibited a defect indistinguishable from R7 lacking all 8 isoforms, some subclasses of olfactory receptor neurons which require N-cadherin for targeting were unaffected by it. This suggested that different isoforms of N-cadherin may be used to regulate connection specificity in different regions of the brain. Further studies are in progress to critically assess why different isoforms of N-cadherin are required in different classes of neurons.

Formation of Connections in the Fly Olfactory System

During the past year we have studying the mechanisms regulating synaptic target specificity in the developing olfactory system. Here different subpopulations of neurons express different odorant receptors. Neurons expressing the same odorant receptor then connect to the same group of neurons in the brain within an anatomical structure called a glomerulus. There are some 43 different odorant receptors and a similar number of glomeruli. Using specific genetic reagents the wiring specificity of different classes of olfactory receptor neurons can be directly visualized and genetically manipulated. We have studied in detail the requirement for N-cadherin and Dscam in elaborating these connections. Dscam plays a key role in promoting targeting to the correct region of the antennal lobe while N-cadherin functions at a later step to promote the formation of a precursorstructure to the glomerulus called a protoglomerulus. We are currently carrying out genetic screens in the olfactory system to identify additional determinants of synaptic specificity.



Technical Research Interest:
The molecular mechanism regulating neuronal connection specificity

The communication between neurons relies on precise patterns of interconnections between them. Our studies have focused on understanding the molecular mechanisms by which these connections from during development. To approach this issue we have been studying the formation of connections in the Drosophila brain. The fly is well suited to classical and molecular genetic analysis, and behavioral paradigms are available for identifying mutations that disrupt the formation of neuronal connections. We have been studying the formation of the connections between photroreceptor neurons (R cells) and their targets in the brain. The compound eye of the fly contains some 800 simple eyes or ommatidia, and each ommatidium contains eight R cells. These cells fall into three classes based on synaptic specificity, R1-R6, R7 and R8. Genetic screens have led to a detailed characterization of the roles of three cell surface proteins which control connection specificity, Lar, a receptor tyrosine phosphatase, and N-cadherin, a classical cadherin with homophilic cell adhesion activty (i.e. this protein mediates adhesion between surfaces of adjacent cells) are required for R1-R6 and R7 connection specificity, while the Flamingo protein, a novel cadherin is required for R1-R6 and R8 specificity but not R7. We propose that different combinations of cell surface molecules specify different patterns of synaptic connections. In addition to our studies on N-cadherin we are also actively exploring the role of another cell adhesion molecule, Dscam, in connection specificity in the olfactory neurons. We have been studying the targeting of 8 different classes of olfactory receptor neurons that connect to 8 different targets. We have demonstrated that Dscam is necessary for the connection of some but not all 8 classes. Remarkably, Dscam is alternatively spliced giving rise to some 38,016 isoforms. These isoforms share the same domain structure but differ in amino sequences within specific domains which we speculate modulates its adhesivity. We propose that this modulation plays an important role in regulating connection specificity. Genetic and biochemical studies are in progress to test this hypothesis.


Publications:
Millard S Sean, Zipursky S Lawrence Dscam-mediated repulsion controls tiling and self-avoidance.. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2008; 18(1): 84-9.
Cayirlioglu Pelin, Kadow Ilona Grunwald, Zhan Xiaoli, Okamura Katsutomo, Suh Greg S B, Gunning Dorian, Lai Eric C, Zipursky S Lawrence Hybrid neurons in a microRNA mutant are putative evolutionary intermediates in insect CO2 sensory systems.. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2008; 319(5867): 1256-60.
Nern Aljoscha, Zhu Yan, Zipursky S Lawrence Local N-cadherin interactions mediate distinct steps in the targeting of lamina neurons.. Neuron. 2008; 58(1): 34-41.
Black Douglas L, Zipursky S Lawrence To cross or not to cross: alternatively spliced forms of the Robo3 receptor regulate discrete steps in axonal midline crossing.. Neuron. 2008; 58(3): 297-8.
Wojtowicz Woj M, Wu Wei, Andre Ingemar, Qian Bin, Baker David, Zipursky S Lawrence A vast repertoire of Dscam binding specificities arises from modular interactions of variable Ig domains.. Cell. 2007; 130(6): 1134-45.
Matthews Benjamin J, Kim Michelle E, Flanagan John J, Hattori Daisuke, Clemens James C, Zipursky S Lawrence, Grueber Wesley B Dendrite self-avoidance is controlled by Dscam.. Cell. 2007; 129(3): 593-604.
Hattori Daisuke, Demir Ebru, Kim Ho Won, Viragh Erika, Zipursky S Lawrence, Dickson Barry J Dscam diversity is essential for neuronal wiring and self-recognition.. Nature. 2007; 449(7159): 223-7.
Millard S Sean, Flanagan John J, Pappu Kartik S, Wu Wei, Zipursky S Lawrence Dscam2 mediates axonal tiling in the Drosophila visual system.. Nature. 2007; 447(7145): 720-4.
Ting Chun-Yuan, Herman Tory, Yonekura Shinichi, Gao Shuying, Wang Jian, Serpe Mihaela, O'Connor Michael B, Zipursky S Lawrence, Lee Chi-Hon Tiling of r7 axons in the Drosophila visual system is mediated both by transduction of an activin signal to the nucleus and by mutual repulsion.. Neuron. 2007; 56(5): 793-806.
Zhu Haitao, Hummel Thomas, Clemens James C, Berdnik Daniela, Zipursky S Lawrence, Luo Liqun Dendritic patterning by Dscam and synaptic partner matching in the Drosophila antennal lobe.. Nature neuroscience. 2006; 9(3): 349-55.
Zipursky S Lawrence, Wojtowicz Woj M, Hattori Daisuke Got diversity? Wiring the fly brain with Dscam.. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2006; 31(10): 581-8.
Nern Aljoscha, Nguyen Louis-Vu T, Herman Tory, Prakash Saurabh, Clandinin Thomas R, Zipursky S Lawrence An isoform-specific allele of Drosophila N-cadherin disrupts a late step of R7 targeting.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005; 102(36): 12944-9.
Hummel T, Zipursky SL Afferent induction of olfactory glomeruli requires N-cadherin.. Neuron. . 2004; 42(1): 77-88.
Wojtowicz WM, Flanagan JJ, Millard SS, Zipursky SL, Clemens JC Alternative splicing of Drosophila Dscam generates axon guidance receptors that exhibit isoform-specific homophilic binding.. Cell. . 2004; 118(5): 619-33.
Zhan XL, Clemens JC, Neves G, Hattori D, Flanagan JJ, Hummel T, Vasconcelos ML, Chess A, Zipursky SL Analysis of Dscam diversity in regulating axon guidance in Drosophila mushroom bodies.. Neuron. . 2004; 43(5): 673-86.
Hummel T, Vasconcelos ML, Clemens JC, Fishilevich Y, Vosshall LB, Zipursky SL Axonal targeting of olfactory receptor neurons in Drosophila is controlled by Dscam.. Neuron. . 2003; 37(2): 221-31.
Lee RC, Clandinin TR, Lee CH, Chen PL, Meinertzhagen IA, Zipursky SL The protocadherin Flamingo is required for axon target selection in the Drosophila visual system.. Nature neuroscience. . 2003; 6(6): 557-63.
Lee, CH Herman, T Clandinin, TR Lee, R Zipursky, SL N-cadherin regulates target specificity in the Drosophila visual system.. Neuron. . 2001; 30(2): 437-50.
Clandinin TR, Zipursky SL Afferent growth cone interactions control synaptic specificity in the Drosophila visual system.. Neuron. . 2000; 28(2): 427-36.
Schmucker D, Clemens JC, Shu H, Worby CA, Xiao J, Muda M, Dixon JE, and Zipursky SL Drosophila Dscam is an axon guidance receptor exhibiting extraordinary molecular diversity.. Cell 2000; 101: 671-684.


The code and contents of http://www.uclaaccess.ucla.edu are ©2009 UCLA ACCESS. All rights reserved.